Historial de revisiones de «Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea)»

Ver los registros de esta página (ver registro de abusos)

Selección de diferencias: marca los botones correspondientes a las versiones a comparar y pulsa Intro o el botón de abajo.
Leyenda: (act) = diferencias con la versión actual, (ant) = diferencias con la versión anterior, m = edición menor.

actant 21:3921:39 25 oct 2022‎ Cojoilustrado discusión contribs.‎ m 1983 bytes −3‎ Texto reemplazado: « =» por «=»
actant 21:1721:17 25 oct 2022‎ Cojoilustrado discusión contribs.‎ m 1986 bytes −3‎ Texto reemplazado: «= » por «=»

actant 15:3815:38 11 feb 2012‎ imported>Edmenb‎ m 1989 bytes 0‎ Protegió "Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea)": Vandalismo excesivo ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinido) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinido))
actant 15:3815:38 11 feb 2012‎ imported>Edmenb‎ 1989 bytes −11 938‎ Sin resumen de edición
actant 15:3715:37 11 feb 2012‎ imported>Edmenb‎ m 13 927 bytes −2495‎ Revertidos los cambios de 77.79.13.35 (disc.) a la última edición de 77.79.13.36

actant 22:3022:30 10 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 16 422 bytes +1141‎ Nueva sección: →‎Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i

actant 12:3112:31 7 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 15 281 bytes +1354‎ Nueva sección: →‎That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.

actant 06:2706:27 6 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 13 927 bytes +1140‎ Nueva sección: →‎In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create

actant 12:0112:01 5 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 12 787 bytes +1185‎ Nueva sección: →‎I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney

actant 18:5018:50 4 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 11 602 bytes +1149‎ Nueva sección: →‎I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
actant 16:1916:19 4 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 10 453 bytes +1513‎ Nueva sección: →‎I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But

actant 09:4009:40 3 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 8940 bytes +834‎ Nueva sección: →‎O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://kimkardashianfullsextapehx.tumblr.com kim kardash
actant 03:3103:31 3 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 8106 bytes +777‎ Nueva sección: →‎I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney

actant 22:3122:31 2 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 7329 bytes +949‎ Nueva sección: →‎Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
actant 18:3418:34 2 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 6380 bytes +1016‎ Nueva sección: →‎It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
actant 17:2817:28 2 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 5364 bytes +812‎ Nueva sección: →‎I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://meganfoxnaked2.typepa
actant 13:2313:23 2 feb 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 4552 bytes +682‎ Nueva sección: →‎Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://demimoorebushav.tumblr.com demi moore bush, >:((,

actant 07:1107:11 31 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 3870 bytes +807‎ Nueva sección: →‎It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t

actant 18:2818:28 29 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 3063 bytes +1074‎ Nueva sección: →‎Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
actant 12:4912:49 29 ene 2012‎ imported>Edmenb‎ 1989 bytes −24 120‎ RV a Cojoilustrado
actant 03:3503:35 29 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 26 109 bytes +1015‎ Nueva sección: →‎I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney

actant 22:1722:17 28 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 25 094 bytes +1051‎ Nueva sección: →‎That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.

actant 15:1415:14 27 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 24 043 bytes +1028‎ Nueva sección: →‎That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.

actant 11:2511:25 26 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 23 015 bytes +1036‎ Nueva sección: →‎I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
actant 08:3608:36 26 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 21 979 bytes +1028‎ Nueva sección: →‎I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about

actant 13:1813:18 25 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 20 951 bytes +866‎ Nueva sección: →‎And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
actant 06:0006:00 25 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 20 085 bytes +767‎ Nueva sección: →‎What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT

actant 17:0317:03 24 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 19 318 bytes +1145‎ Nueva sección: →‎Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
actant 15:3115:31 24 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 18 173 bytes +920‎ Nueva sección: →‎Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
actant 15:0015:00 24 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 17 253 bytes +858‎ Nueva sección: →‎Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's

actant 14:4314:43 19 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.37 discusión‎ 16 395 bytes +1111‎ Nueva sección: →‎I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie

actant 20:4420:44 17 ene 2012‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 15 284 bytes +889‎ Nueva sección: →‎Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://selenagomezinabikinigu.tumblr.com selena gomez in a bikini,
actant 11:3111:31 17 ene 2012‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 14 395 bytes +928‎ Nueva sección: →‎I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://kellykellynudevb.tumb

actant 16:1516:15 16 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 13 467 bytes +939‎ Nueva sección: →‎I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
actant 08:1708:17 16 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.35 discusión‎ 12 528 bytes +761‎ Nueva sección: →‎I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom

actant 23:4823:48 15 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 11 767 bytes +828‎ Nueva sección: →‎O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://jessicaalbanudeca.tumblr.com jessica alba nude,
actant 16:3116:31 15 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 10 939 bytes +1036‎ Nueva sección: →‎Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
actant 11:3311:33 15 ene 2012‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 9903 bytes +982‎ Nueva sección: →‎I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But

actant 09:5409:54 14 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 8921 bytes +1061‎ Nueva sección: →‎I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
actant 03:2003:20 14 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 7860 bytes +920‎ Nueva sección: →‎I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about

actant 18:5418:54 13 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 6940 bytes +1038‎ Nueva sección: →‎I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
actant 08:0708:07 13 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 5902 bytes +949‎ Nueva sección: →‎It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo

actant 17:3317:33 12 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.36 discusión‎ 4953 bytes +882‎ Nueva sección: →‎I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo

actant 22:1422:14 11 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 4071 bytes +1011‎ Nueva sección: →‎I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
actant 10:3510:35 11 ene 2012‎ 77.79.13.34 discusión‎ 3060 bytes +1071‎ Nueva sección: →‎One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v

actant 04:5504:55 8 ene 2012‎ imported>Edmenb‎ 1989 bytes −3845‎ RV
actant 01:2301:23 8 ene 2012‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 5834 bytes +928‎ Nueva sección: →‎In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create

actant 08:5708:57 5 ene 2012‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 4906 bytes +787‎ Nueva sección: →‎One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v

actant 09:1509:15 29 dic 2011‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 4119 bytes +1159‎ Nueva sección: →‎That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'

actant 12:2612:26 27 dic 2011‎ 149.255.39.50 discusión‎ 2960 bytes +971‎ Nueva sección: →‎I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie

Obtenido de «https://www.venciclopedia.org/index.php?title=Venciclopedia:Discusiones_(miscelánea)»