Contribuciones del usuario 77.79.13.35
Para 77.79.13.35 discusión registro de bloqueos registros registro del filtro antiabusos
11 feb 2012
- 13:3013:30 11 feb 2012 difs. hist. +1141 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
8 feb 2012
- 03:3103:31 8 feb 2012 difs. hist. +1354 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
5 feb 2012
- 07:1907:19 5 feb 2012 difs. hist. +1513 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
4 feb 2012
- 00:4000:40 4 feb 2012 difs. hist. +834 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://kimkardashianfullsextapehx.tumblr.com kim kardash
3 feb 2012
- 18:3118:31 3 feb 2012 difs. hist. +777 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
31 ene 2012
- 22:1122:11 31 ene 2012 difs. hist. +807 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
25 ene 2012
- 21:0021:00 25 ene 2012 difs. hist. +767 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 08:0308:03 25 ene 2012 difs. hist. +1145 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 06:3106:31 25 ene 2012 difs. hist. +920 Venciclopedia:Discusiones (miscelánea) Nueva sección: →Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is